Rights and Accountability 7 March 2025

Demonstrators in Geneva denounce Israel’s genocide in Gaza, October 2024. A UN-mandated conference on Palestinian rights set to be held in the city on 7 March 2025 was canceled abruptly by the Swiss government after Israeli pressure.
ZUMAPRESS/NewscomSwitzerland abruptly canceled a conference it was mandated to hold by the United Nations General Assembly on the rights of Palestinians under Israeli military occupation. The move this week came after pressure from Israel and apparently due to fear of retribution from the United States.
Ostensibly neutral, Switzerland is the depositary of the 1949 Fourth Geneva Convention, a key international treaty that protects civilians under military occupation.
Last September, 124 UN member states voted for a landmark resolution endorsing the historic ruling by the International Court of Justice that Israel’s occupation of Palestinian land is inherently illegal and must end within 12 months.
The resolution also tasked Switzerland with convening a conference of states that have signed the Fourth Geneva Convention – so-called high contracting parties – in order “to enforce the Convention in the occupied Palestinian territory, including East Jerusalem, and to ensure respect thereof.”
Russia, China, Brazil, South Africa and even such close Israeli allies as France, Spain and Belgium were part of the massive global majority supporting the measure.
Just 14 governments voted against the resolution, including Israel and the United States. Forty-three states abstained.
“Lack of consensus”
But despite the overwhelming global support for the conference, Switzerland canceled it on Thursday, a day before it was supposed to convene in Geneva, claiming a “lack of consensus.”
The Swiss government asserted that after it submitted a “draft final declaration” to be adopted by the conference it “became clear that the divergent positions of the high contracting parties meant there would not be sufficient support from the international community to hold the conference and adopt a final declaration.”
This excuse cut no ice with observers including Craig Mokhiber, a UN human rights official who resigned in October 2023 over the world body’s inaction in the face of Israel’s unfolding genocide in Gaza.
“Switzerland’s watering down of the declaration to accommodate perpetrator states and their complicit allies, rather than sticking to the letter of the requirements of international humanitarian law, as defined in [the Fourth Geneva Convention], and then canceling the conference for alleged lack of agreement, constitutes a clear act of politicization, a breach of neutrality, an abdication of its duties as depositary and a clear effort to sabotage the process,” Mokhiber wrote on Friday.Mokhiber noted the huge global majority that voted in favor of the conference, adding, “And yet Switzerland refuses to convene the conference, breaching its duties as depository of the Geneva Conventions and signaling that the historic Swiss tradition of neutrality is dead.”
The Organization of Islamic Cooperation – a grouping of dozens of Muslim-majority countries – said it regretted that the conference would not go ahead and implicitly blamed Switzerland for the failure as well.
The OIC mission in Geneva said that “the draft declaration neither appeared to fulfill the agreed mandate, nor was it commensurate with the gravity of [the] situation.”
As a result, “it could not muster necessary cross-regional support, including from OIC member states.”
Israeli pressure, fear of Washington
Israel’s foreign ministry hailed the cancellation as a “significant diplomatic achievement” and credited its foreign minister Gideon Sa’ar for working “intensively … under the radar” to prevent the conference.
But even before apparently succumbing to Israeli bullying and pressure and canceling the conference altogether, Switzerland was already trying to evade its obligations and turn the meeting into an empty charade.
“The Swiss foreign ministry has become increasingly nervous in recent weeks,” Switzerland’s public broadcaster SWI swissinfo.ch reported on Thursday, before the cancellation had been announced.
“Israel has condemned Switzerland for hosting the event, which it sees as ‘part of the legal warfare against Israel,’” SWI swissinfo.ch reported.
And although the September 2024 UN resolution specified that the conference was to focus on implementation of the Fourth Geneva Convention in the occupied Palestinian territories, SWI swissinfo.ch noted that “In the run-up to the meeting, it’s been reported that no specific examples or current conflicts will be discussed or even mentioned in Geneva.”
“Such political maneuvering by Switzerland is typical when it comes to the Middle East conflict, which is full of legal and political pitfalls,” the public broadcaster added.
The Alpine nation appears to have been motivated not just by fear of criticism from Israel, but also from Washington, Israel’s main political sponsor, arms supplier and accomplice in the genocide.
The planned conference “comes at a time when Israel enjoys close ties with the new Trump administration in the United States,” SWI swissinfo.ch observed.
“This is another reason for Switzerland’s cautious approach – right now, on the international stage, everything has the potential to become a diplomatic bargaining chip. In Bern, the main worry is American tariffs on Swiss exports.”
Mokhiber places Switzerland’s cave-in in the context of the broader assault on international institutions, aiming to shield Israel.
“Block by block, Western governments are tearing down the modern edifice of international law in order to protect a single, oppressive foreign regime – one currently on trial for genocide in the [International Court of Justice] and the leaders of which are wanted by the [International Criminal Court] for crimes against humanity,” Mokhiber wrote.
“Switzerland has joined this vandalistic project, arresting journalists who criticize the Israeli regime, and now blocking the Geneva conference called for by a clear majority of countries to hold the regime accountable.”
Comments
conference
Permalink Paul Eisenhut replied on
switzerlands role as a neutral place for negogiations and peace deals has just become obsolete
due to a lack of courage and moral authority , due to pressure from Israel.
Cowardice, complicity and moral bankruptcy
Permalink Barry Greene replied on
Assuming that there are a few nations in which the governments, or what passes for governments - usually terrorist organisations which have highjacked and ghettoised electoral processes in one way or another, extorting election 'wins' and dodgy mandates from incredibly ignorant and easily frightened and cowed electorates, such as in The Fascist States of America - may not necessarily be motivated by animus, contempt, racist hatred toward the Palestinians, then the only possible conclusion left is that those 'governments' and ruling institutions are terminally inmfected with the most stinking, revolting cowardice imaginable. Perhaps every last politician in Switzerland is motivated by anti-semitism - i.e. anti-Palestinian anti-semitism (apparently it's necessary to remind people of two critical things: that Palestinians are Semites; and that the term 'anti-semitism' was weaponised by the Zionist movement over 125 years ago to ostensibly refer only to Jews, but behind this deliberate manipulation lies one of the great propaganda and mind-control coups of the last 125 years, maliciously engineered to brainwash the world into believing that Jews are uniquely discriminated against, and that no racism is equal to 'anti-semitism'), and iof that's the case, then all we're left with is the sickening spinelessness of these Swiss collaborators in genocide. Because the quite depressing and very angering truth is that we will be fighting an uphill battle against the Zionazi hordes and their sick cult, and the evil little illegitimate terrorist shithole calling itself 'Israel' for a long time yet unless entire countries start to grow spines and tell the Zionist and American terrorists to f***k off, risk the economic and diplomatic shitstorm sure to follow, and hold theiur ground, in what will eventually be the sure knowledge that courage will beget courage, and that a critical mass of nations and people will finally tilt the scales of justice toward the Palestinians.
Switzerland and the High Contracting Parties to the Geneva Conve
Permalink Carol Scheller replied on
The lack of courage of Foreign Minister Ignazio Cassis, whose professional experience before politics was, as a doctor, in medecine and public health, is a source of shame to many of us who knew a different Switzerland when we were younger. The moral direction of our government is left to citizen groups and individuals who have no voice in decisions like this one. We simply learn about it from announcements in the press and mourn the government's deliberate renouncement of its former role as a defender of human rights, an example that considerably outweighed its small size. Small is now its diplomatic size, and in this case, small is not beautiful.
no surprise
Permalink Peter Purich replied on
Canada "abstained" ... what you expect being a NATO vassal.
"Block by block, Western governments are tearing down the modern edifice of international law in order to protect a single, oppressive foreign regime" -- a single, USA proxy force kept alive to destroy West Asia (hint: oil).
Don't buy Swiss chocolate: tastes genocide.
Israel alliances
Permalink William Fell-Holden replied on
USA alliance to Israel upholds the pure evil of Israel's slaughter, genocide and holocaust on Palestine and Palestinians. It is cowardly of Switzerland to cancel the meeting arranged.
This is extremely important.
Permalink James Prendergast replied on
This is extremely important.
Add new comment