Israel lobby, UK officials attempt to shut down Univ. of Southampton conference

Ali Abunimah Lobby Watch 16 March 2015

Communities secretary Eric Pickles has become the most senior UK government official to attack a University of Southampton conference addressing Palestinian legal rights. (Department for Communities and Local Government/Flickr)

Academics are pushing back against an effort by Israel lobby groups and UK government officials to cancel or alter a law school conference related to Palestine.

Almost 300 professors at universities in the UK and other countries have signed a statement expressing “principled and full support for the University of Southampton’s commitment to freedom of speech and scholarly debate.”

The University of Southampton has come under intense pressure over the conference “International Law and the State of Israel: Legitimacy, Responsibility and Exceptionalism,” scheduled for 17-19 April.

The conference will “engage controversial questions concerning the manner of Israel’s foundation and its nature, including ongoing forced displacements of Palestinians and associated injustices,” the organizers wrote in a statement to The Electronic Intifada.

The organizers are University of Southampton law professor Oren Ben-Dor; George Bisharat, professor at the University of California Hastings College of Law; Juman Asmail, a law graduate from Southampton and Southampton engineering professor Suleiman Sharkh.

The conference “will examine how international law could be deployed, expanded, even re-imagined, in order to achieve regional peace and reconciliation based on justice,” the organizers add.

The provisional program includes presentations from a range of well-known academics and experts including University of California at Los Angeles historian Gabi Piterberg; Nur Musalha, a historian who has written extensively about Zionist plans to expel Palestinians; University of Exeter historian Ilan Pappe and Princeton University emeritus professor and former UN Special Rapporteur Richard Falk, among others.

Smear campaign

Pro-Israel media and lobby groups have been mounting an ever more shrill campaign using Islamophobic themes and casting aspersions of anti-Semitism to smear organizers and speakers.

Some have called for the conference to be banned outright, while others are urging the university to require pro-Israel speakers, on the grounds that the conference is “one sided.”

The Jerusalem Post reports that late last year, “leaders of the Jewish community, including representatives of the Jewish Leadership Council, Board of Deputies and the Union of Jewish Students” sent a letter to the university to cancel the conference.

The Post says it has “exclusively” seen “extracts” of the letter.

A Southampton spokesperson emailed The Electronic Intifada that the university “received a number of representations concerning this conference, both those expressing concerns and those in support,” but would not provide details of the organizations that had approached it.

The Electronic Intifada has filed a Freedom of Information request with the university in an effort to bring more light on the Israel lobby’s campaign against academic freedom.

Zionist Federation petition

The UK’s Zionist Federation launched a petition calling on the university to ban the conference, a demand to which several members of parliament have added their voices.

The mass circulation tabloid The Daily Express published an op-ed associating the conference with support for the notorious Islamic State militant “Jihadi John” and demanding that the government cut funding to Southampton.

The Jewish Chronicle trumpeted criticism by a former Conservative government minister and quoted Southampton mathematics professor Tim Sluckin claiming that the purpose of the conference is to “delegitimize Israel.”

Sluckin, who is also secretary of the Southampton Hebrew Congregation, said the conference “makes me feel uncomfortable as a Jew.”

Government collusion

Perhaps the most worrying aspect for supporters of free speech is the apparent collusion of UK government officials in the attempt to smear and suppress the conference.

Last week, Conservative cabinet minister Eric Pickles warned the University of Southampton against “allowing a one-sided diatribe.” According to Jewish News, this made Pickles, who is Secretary of State for Communities and Local Government, “the most senior politician yet to intervene” over the conference.

Last December, Pickles’ department issued a report promising “government action on addressing anti-Semitism.” But as The Electronic Intifada reported, the government document “conflates anti-Semitism with criticism of the State of Israel” and misrepresents the Palestinian call for the academic boycott of Israeli institutions.

Pickles has consistently conflated “anti-Semitism” with solidarity for Palestinians. He has for instance condemned the London Borough of Tower Hamlets for “flying a Palestinian flag.” London municipalities have a long tradition of international solidarity, especially during the struggle against apartheid in South Africa.

The Jerusalem Post also revealed that in February, UK ambassador to Israel Matthew Gould met with UK university heads to discuss the limits of “freedom of speech” relating to Israel.

According to the Post, the University of Southampton’s refusal to cave in over the conference was a topic of discussion in the meeting.

Ben White writes for Middle East Monitor that the university’s “stubborn commitment to freedom of speech has clearly angered Britain’s Israel lobby, but the bigger question here is why a UK ambassador was involved in the first place.”

The UK Foreign Office confirmed to White that the meeting had taken place but as White notes, the government spokesperson “did not elaborate on whether lobbying British universities” on behalf of Israel “was part of the ambassador’s remit.”

“Legal obligations”

The organizers have rejected accusations that the conference is “one sided.”

“Diligent efforts, including face-to-face meetings with leading intellectuals in Israel, were made to ensure the widest range of opinions possible,” the organizers wrote in their statement.

“Those who chose to abstain, however, cannot derail the legitimate, if challenging, academic discussion the conference will inspire.”

The organizers also say that are “deeply grateful for the University of Southampton’s commitment to freedom of speech and expression, which should set an example for universities worldwide.”

But the university has been more circumspect. Its spokesperson assured The Electronic Intifada that it “is legally obliged under the Education (No. 2) Act 1986, to ensure that freedom of speech within the law is secured for members, students and employees of the university, as well as for visiting speakers.”

“We must ensure that academic staff have the freedom within the law to question and test received wisdom, and to put forward new ideas and controversial or unpopular opinions.”

University appeasing critics?

But in what looks like an attempt to appease critics, the spokesperson adds that “For the avoidance of doubt, the University of Southampton is not expressing an opinion or taking any particular standpoint in relation to the conference, ‘International Law and the State of Israel,’ but is fulfilling its legal obligations.”

Universities often endorse conferences and take strong stances in favor of various kinds of research on human rights, economic, medical or environmental issues.

For instance, University of Southampton Vice-Chancellor Don Nutbeam enthuses about a new research collaboration between his institution and the insurance company Lloyds Register.

But Southampton’s statement about the Israel conference follows an emerging pattern among universities that have come under attack for research or advocacy in relation to Palestinian rights: administrators assert their minimum obligations on free speech grounds while distancing themselves from the content, as if believing that Israel should be held accountable under international law were something odious and offensive.

Tags

Comments

picture

Robert Darmody replied on

It is old, poorly maintained and finally wearing out! The strident accusations of 'anti-Semitism' like all over used and abused terms that used to mean something, are falling on many deaf ears lately. The threadbare blanket formerly used to shield public from the truth is now all the more transparent! There is NOTHING Jewish about committing genocide and stealing homes and land. Zionists are counterfeits!

picture

Ageel Shatry replied on

Robert, that is an excellent analysis. What's unfortunate, is that like the boy who cried wolf, when there is a real anti-Semitic incident, fewer and fewer people will take heed.
Even more disturbing is the rapid erosion on our freedom of speech. We have seen it here in the US, as was the case at the University of Illinois and the firing of Steven Salaita. It strikes me as ironic, that those same people who constantly bombard us with the myth of Israel being the 'only democracy in the Middle East' (lest we forget, freedom of speech is a vital cornerstone of democracy) are the same ones stifling our freedom of speech! It is not the Bin Ladens or the Iranians (or whoever the bogeyman of the day is) who are curtailing our freedoms. "They hate us because of our freedom" is a mantra I'm certain your are aware of. Seems like it's being directed to the wrong group!

picture

eGuard replied on

Jerusalem Post: "... Jewish representatives – who included Britain’s ambassador to Israel, Matthew Gould – ...". The UK ambassador a Jewish representative? (btw, Lloyd's Register is not the London insurance market "Lloyd's of London". It the engineering, consultancy & quality checking company).

picture

Jim Newsham replied on

Pickles is the biggest total prick of a bunch useless Tory arseholes who are hand-in-hand with the fascist state. I look forward to getting rid of them in the May elections and I hope we never see this man again. Hopefully a Labour government will be prepared to challenge Israel more. The UK & US have been responsible for a total lack of support for the Palestinians -their blood is on our hands. Let's remember the Tories called Nelson Mandela a 'terrorist' -they have zero international credibility. An embarrassing bunch of arseholes!!

picture

Bev Hussein replied on

You realise Milliband is himself Jewish, and a ' friend of Israel '? Don't hold your breath...

picture

Mansha Hussain replied on

And it's a matter of time and the truth will prevail. Our British aid workers and journalist that have been killed by the Zionist regime shall not be forgotten as will not their families who suffer everyday. There must be a Real cause for them to risk their life to document and bring the truth through to us the British public. Houses and lives are still being ruined every day why live to regret tomorrow when we can resolve today indeed there is a good and bad. I wish to The Lord that the good prevails. Ameen

Ali Abunimah

Co-founder of The Electronic Intifada and author of The Battle for Justice in Palestine, now out from Haymarket Books.

Also wrote One Country: A Bold-Proposal to End the Israeli-Palestinian Impasse. Opinions are mine alone.