Lobby Watch 6 October 2021
In this new mini-documentary from The Electronic Intifada, I explain the difference between anti-Zionism and anti-Semitism.
A clear and simple way to define anti-Semitism is bigotry or discrimination against Jews just for being Jews. Palestinians have always clearly spoken out against anti-Jewish bigotry.
But I break down how supporters of Zionism are trying to contort and redefine what anti-Semitism is in order to shield Israel from accountability for its crimes against Palestinians.
Nowadays, Zionists are trying to soften their image by rebranding their ideology as a feel-good personal identity which deserves to be protected and even celebrated.
But I explain how Zionism is Israel’s state ideology, predicated on the expulsion of Palestinians from their homeland solely because they are not Jewish.
Zionism was conceived by anti-Semitic European Protestants even before it was adopted by secular Jewish nationalists who aimed to establish “a rampart” of European colonialism in Southwest Asia.
At every step – to the present day – the Zionist movement could not fulfill its goals without the violent dispossession, dehumanization and subjugation of Palestinians.
To mask this reality, Israel and its lobbies are pushing hard for legislation and policies to enshrine their definition of anti-Semitism all over the world.
The main vehicle for this is the so-called IHRA definition of anti-Semitism.
It overtly conflates criticism of Israel and Zionism, on the one hand, with anti-Jewish bigotry, on the other.
It is being used to silence and repress Palestine solidarity campaigners in many countries by smearing them as the racists.
But the movement in support of Palestinian rights is growing, despite political and legal pressure.
I hope this video will be a useful tool for anyone new to the issue or curious about the ways in which students, activists and anti-racist movements are fighting the smear campaigns.
Produced, directed and edited by Tala Kaddoura.
Sound design by Ahmed K.
Written by Tala Kaddoura, Nora Barrows-Friedman and Ali Abunimah.
Production assistance from Tamara Nassar and Asa Winstanley.
For further reading on these issues, here is a list of useful resources:
- “Distorted Definition: Redefining anti-Semitism to silence advocacy for Palestinian rights” – Palestine Legal’s extensive resource on the Israel lobby’s attempts to redefine anti-Jewish bigotry
- The Israel Lobby: USA – Watch the film the Israel lobby didn’t want you to see, a four-part undercover investigation by Al Jazeera into Israel’s covert influence campaign in the United States
- “Professor David Miller fired after Israel lobby smear campaign” – UK professor sacked after the Israel lobby orchestrated a campaign falsely accusing him of anti-Semitism over his criticism of Israel
- “Israel lobby urges Biden to ramp up attacks on college activists” – how Israel lobby groups are smearing anti-racist college students with the charge of anti-Semitism
- “France to criminalize anti-Zionism” – An example of how European countries are implementing Israel’s agenda under the guise of fighting bigotry
- “Anti-Semitism vs. anti-colonialism” – Palestinian intellectual and historian Joseph Massad explains how anti-Semitism smears are used to suppress resistance to racism and colonialism
- “Palestine and the anxiety of existence” – Steven Salaita on confronting and dismantling the myths of Zionism
- “IHRA definition of anti-Semitism silences solidarity” – Rowan Gaudet’s sharp analysis on the weaponization of anti-Semitism to silence Israel’s critics
- “Approach new definition of anti-Semitism with caution, Palestinians say” – on a new definition of anti-Semitism that rebukes the IHRA but omits crucial Palestinian perspectives
- “Trump appeases Israel lobby with executive order” – Background on Trump’s formal adoption of the IHRA definition
- “UK universities reject Israel lobby’s anti-Semitism definition” – How the government is threatening UK institutions to adopt the IHRA definition
- “Neo-Nazis push bogus anti-Semitism definition at EU” – Why EU leaders are joining with the far-right to promote the IHRA
- “Criminalizing Israel isn’t anti-Semitic, say 80 percent of Canadians” – Despite heavy pressure from Israel lobbies in Canada, most people don’t buy the propaganda tying support of Palestinian rights to anti-Jewish bigotry
Comments
Excellent 😊👌
Permalink Samir replied on
Excellent 😊👌
Antisemitism actuality
Permalink abraham Weizfeld Phd replied on
It is obvious that Antisemitism is used by Zionist ideologues to put down opposition to the Zionist colonial regime, however, that does not mean that Antisemitism is not real. It is also obvious that Antisemitism has and does target Jewish people. We have been targeted in fascist countries, democratic countries and socialist countries as in the Stalinized USSR. To ignore Antisemitism is to deny it exists. And to deny that Antisemitism exists other than an expression of Anti-Zionism is to cover up that Antisemitism. The critics of Zionism who equate Zionism and the Jewish People - as the Zionist State does - are being Antisemitic. The Jewish Bund has always opposed both Antisemitism and Zionism.
it is well past time...
Permalink arnie passman replied on
it is well past time...
Wondering
Permalink asking for a friend ;) replied on
Can you kindly link to the source of Hertzel's quotes?
Thank you
The Zionist Bait and Switch Scam
Permalink Rodger Kroell replied on
Great video: a clear, convincing political dissection of the issues examined. Nora correctly points out the false equivalence drawn by Zionists between the terms antisemitism (hatred of Jews) and anti-Zionism (any criticism of Israel/Zionism). The German word Antisemitismus [antisemitism] was coined in 1879 by the German journalist Wilhelm Marr, the author of the racist treatise, Der Sieg des Judenthums über das Germanenthum [The Victory of Judaism over Germanism]. He created this pseudoscientific term to use in place of the more vulgar German noun Judenhass [Jew-hatred] (Zimmermann, Moshe. Wilhelm Marr: The Patriarch of Anti-Semitism. Oxford: Oxford UP, 1986, 70).
It may seem surprising that Zionists have intentionally added what amounts to a relatively innocuous secondary definition to follow the harsher primary definition of antisemitism. But Nora makes it clear that Zionists have their reasons for doing this, namely, to stifle criticism of Israel’s racist settler colonial ideology by contriving to smear all opponents of the regime with the charge of being somehow, nonsensically, guilty of hating Jews. To all appearances, Zionists have attempted to execute a bait and switch scam — selling their counterfactual definition of antisemitism — in order to disguise their failure to refute repeated claims that Israel administers a system of political, social, and economic segregation & discrimination, a system which clearly meets the legal definition of the international crime of apartheid.