Pro-Israel groups vow to “eliminate” BDS

Rania Khalek Activism and BDS Beat 7 June 2016

A jumbo screen displays the logos of groups taking part in Israel’s #StopBDS conference in the UN General Assembly hall in New York, on 31 May.

Rania Khalek

As the Palestinian-led boycott, divestment and sanctions (BDS) movement grows across the US, Israel’s supporters are cranking up hatred against Palestine solidarity activism in both rhetoric and tactics.

The general anxiety about BDS was on full display last week, when an estimated 1,500 people gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York City for the first international #StopBDS conference.

The event was organized by the Israeli mission to the UN and the World Jewish Congress in partnership with such Israel lobby groups as StandWithUs, the Zionist Organization of America, CAMERA, the Anti-Defamation League and Hillel.

As The Electronic Intifada reported, public relations and branding experts told participants that Israel faces a deep and persistent crisis in selling itself, while the BDS movement is reaching more people with messages that resonate.

The majority of those who attended were either college students affiliated with pro-Israel groups or high school students whose parents had brought them to the summit, the official theme of which was to “build bridges not boycott.”

But the rhetoric that filled the halls of the UN was far less diplomatic.

Aimed at disseminating strategies for crushing BDS, the conference featured calls for coordinated harassment of Palestine solidarity activists and championed outlawing free speech to censor growing support for the movement.

These tactics were justified on the basis of paranoid fantasies that portrayed BDS as an anti-Semitic global conspiracy with Nazi roots.

“Fail even faster”

The conference kicked off with a speech by Danny Danon, Israel’s ambassador to the UN.

“BDS is the true face of modern anti-Semitism,” said Danon, equating the UN’s criticism of Israeli human rights abuses with Nazi Germany’s persecution of Jews in the 1930s.

Next, the audience was treated to a pre-recorded message from Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu thanking them for fighting BDS.

“BDS has nothing to do with human rights,” Netanyahu assured them. “With your help this immoral movement will fail even faster.”

“The era of the quiet Jew, the timid Jew, is over,” crowed Ronald Lauder, president of the World Jewish Congress. “We are no longer victims. We no longer have to rely on others to protect us. And we’re absolutely done being quiet. Enough is enough!”

Lauder then launched into a sectarian tirade against the Muslim Student Association, which he portrayed as a vehicle for the Muslim Brotherhood to impose the Quran on Western governments.

Lauder also implored students to snitch on their BDS-supporting peers and professors and urged financial bullying to ensure censorship by universities.

“If your school or your professor is backing BDS in any way, contact us,” he commanded. “We’ll urge alumni to stop any donations.”

Elyakim Rubinstein, a vice-president of Israel’s high court, characterized BDS as “political terrorism under the guise of freedom of speech.” He argued that calls for boycotting Israel are not protected by the First Amendment in the US.

Contrary to Rubinstein’s claim, the US Supreme Court ruled in 1982 that politically motivated boycotts are protected free speech.

But pro-Israel groups have sought – unsuccessfully so far – to recast the BDS movement and Palestine activism more generally as discrimination against Jews and therefore a violation of civil rights law.

Paranoid fantasies

Shoham Nicolet, CEO of the Israeli-American Council, alleged that Jewish students across America are being “forced to hide their Jewish identity” out of fear of “retaliation” from BDS activists, another claim with no basis in reality.

BDS is “like a cancer,” said Nicolet. “This violent racist hate movement must be eliminated” by “rebranding” it as akin to the Ku Klux Klan, he added.

“Joining BDS should be a one-way ticket to excommunication from polite society,” he said. “When people think BDS, their stomachs need to turn. We need to name and shame any person who supports this movement.”

Daniel Birnbaum, the CEO of Sodastream, which was pressured by the BDS movement to relocate its factory from an illegal Israeli settlement in the occupied West Bank, blasted the UN as a “house of shame.”

He denied the existence of Israel’s military occupation in the West Bank and accused the media of “nurturing the conflict.”

Birnbaum also maintained that an Israeli soldier was “not only equipped with the best gun” but “with the biggest heart.”

An Israeli soldier was “not motivated by 72 virgins,” he added, deploying a bigoted talking point frequently used to portray Palestinians as barbaric religious fanatics rather than people with legitimate rights which they are struggling to regain.

These paranoid fantasies wrapped in sectarian chauvinism and bigotry were epitomized by the unhinged reaction from Morton Klein, head of the Zionist Organization of America, when The Electronic Intifada attempted to interview him.

Before even being asked a question, Klein labeled this reporter a “vicious, anti-Semitic, Nazi-like Jew hater.”

Klein went on to justify newly appointed Israeli defense minister Avigdor Lieberman’s call to behead Palestinian citizens of Israel for disloyalty to the state.

He even accused The Electronic Intifada of “attacking Jewish people and Jewish leaders” for bringing up Lieberman’s incitement. And he repeatedly alleged that The Electronic Intifada’s Ali Abunimah is “a liar.”

He referred several times to a debate he had had with Abunimah at the University of Michigan more than a decade ago.

Klein’s absolute rejection of a civil conversation is all the more remarkable given the conference’s supposed goal of building bridges.

“Use all fire-power”

Booklet handed out to participants in Israel’s Stop BDS conference uses anti-Semitic tropes.

The dogmatic fixation on BDS from conference speakers was rammed home in a 30-page guidebook handed out to attendees.

The booklet smears Palestine solidarity activism as an all-powerful movement of hate and even resorts to classic anti-Semitic tropes, warning that “BDS’ tentacles have reached nearly all areas of society” to manipulate “our future leaders and opinion makers.”

Under a section titled “Strategies and Tools,” students are advised to “contact your elected officials and encourage them to draft legislation that outlaws academic boycotts of Israel.”

The same page urges students to purge BDS supporters from all facets of life through outing “the delegitimizers” and “focusing all available fire-power – whether financial, social, legal etc. – to expose the individual and prevent them from operating in the campus, labor union or any other forum.”

“If anti-Israel students falsely accuse pro-Israel students of discrimination in violation of campus policy, this may constitute harassment,” the booklet claims.

Conference booklet offers tips on how to undermine Palestine solidarity movement.

These tired talking points were successfully absorbed by young people in the audience.

“I have never felt personally threatened physically,” admitted Tova, an 18-year-old student at New York’s Hunter College who is involved in the Hunter Students for Israel Club.

Still, she accused the Students for Justice in Palestine chapter at Hunter of holding rallies that are “extraordinarily anti-Semitic and anti-Zionist.” Asked to provide an example of SJP’s alleged anti-Semitism, Tova responded that “a woman once yelled at me, ‘Israel created Hamas!’ and then walked away.”

She also accused SJP of being “violent and loud” whereas “the Students for Israel Club is all about peace and is quieter.” When asked to elaborate, she explained that SJP’s “club poster is a fist with a Palestinian flag, which is a little scary to see.”

“There’s a difference between free speech and hate speech,” she continued. “I think the way that [BDS] is being implemented is hate speech.”

It’s no mystery where she got that idea.

Correction: This article initially stated that Danny Danon had been rejected by Brazil as ambassador because of his leadership role in the West Bank settler movement. In fact that was Danny Dayan.

Tags

Comments

picture

Zionism Is Not Judiaism replied on

Dear Racist Fascist Torah Desecrators :

It would be so much easier for all concerned if you were to change your wicked ways.

Admit and confront your racism. End Zionism. Stop preventing the Palestinian diaspora returning to their homes. Make just compensation to them for their losses.

Learn the hard fought lessons of history. Inclusion, equality, justice, respect, dignity, "separation of church and state" and democracy are the way to go. Ask yourselves what have treating others like dirt gotten you? That is the best chance for peace.

In short, No Equality, No Peace!

Jim Crow in Palestine must go.

picture

Fernando de Sousa Falcão replied on

Excellent comment! the Zionists have to leave to hide behind the alleged anti-Semitism to justify their crimes in Palestine, even because Zionism is not Judaism!

picture

Daniel replied on

Why isn't the BDS movement repeatedly calling these people what they are? They are anti Arab, Islamophobic, racist Jewish supremacists! Turn the tables on them for once. Put THEM on the defensive. I swear, sometimes it seems that the Palestinian movement is way too timid.

picture

Michael replied on

They seem to be missing the point here. When the Jews were freed from the terror of the camps after the second world war, they had all the sympathy of the world as THEY were the victims. Now that the Palestinians are the victims of hatred and destruction, they rightly deserve the same sympathy as the Jews received. The fact that it's the Jews who are persecuting the Arabs, dose not mean they should get away with it, they should be treated the same way any other country who did the same, such as South Africa, were treated.

picture

Jones replied on

One thing is for sure. The truth doesnt need friends, groups, coalitions, nor does it need to be called anything or prooved. Standing on the moon, I see what Israel is and does. After a while, its going to harder to lie.

picture

Joel Arendt replied on

That this meeting could take place at the UN indicates where the institution stands. One is in a double-bind about the UN. If it did not exist then it would have to be created because such a platform is crucial to building consensus. The domination of the UN by big powers makes on wish to destroy the organisation.

A platform to end Zionism would not have been held at the UN.

So the only way forward is to organise outside the UN. The BDS campaign must be taken to every house, every street, every village and every town, every school, university, college, factory, football and knitting club. We can and shall win. It requires patience, determination and a spine.

BDS by itself will not end injustice in Palestine. It requires the building of solidarity links with struggles inside Israel for equality as citizens of a state of its cistizens, the horrors of the occupation, the trauma of the refugee camps and the rights of return, the fragmentation of the diaspora. Palestinians Arabs, Jews and Christians should overcome their lack of organisational and operational unity in order to confront Zionism.
The arc of history is long and bends towrds justice. Keep your eyes on the prize and hold on. These ideas sustained struggles with impossible odds.

picture

Rord replied on

Small correction: you mixed up Danny Danon with Dani Dayan. Dayan was rejected as ambassador in Brazil.

picture

tom hall replied on

Thank you, Rania. Well done- in more ways than one. Klein grilled himself to a crisp on both sides. His ferocious blinking as he denounced Electronic Intifada and Ali Abunimah demonstrated not the force of his arguments but the stress underpinning his lies.

picture

Rodger Kroell replied on

Great article -- as usual -- Rania. The brief (1-minute, 45-second) video of your interview with Morton A. Klein, president of the Zionist Organization of America (ZOA), should be viewed by every American.

The “new McCarthyism” is one term which has been employed recently to describe U.S. leaders’ latest attempts to silence, pacify and deprive American citizens of their constitutional right of free speech: college students, BDS activists, striking workers, whistleblowers, human rights activists, antiwar protesters, radical feminists, (dark-skinned) ethnic minorities, the unemployed, underemployed, and others.

But the “new McCarthyism” is only one component of a larger hybrid “war” against the disenfranchised multitude, the Global North’s “war” against what is rapidly becoming a “planet of slums” ruled by garrison states: the U.S., EU, Israel and a few strategically located comprador elite states around the world.

Neoliberal austerity programs are being imposed by the IMF and World Bank on countries around the world. Nothing less than full-spectrum dominance is their goal: including terrestrial-, aerial-, maritime-, subterranean-, extraterrestrial-, psychological- and cyber-warfare.

Israel’s Occupied territories have been employed as a laboratory for the global pacification industry for quite some time. Palestinians have been used as laboratory test cases for the use of high-tech weaponry and tactics in an urban environment since at least 1967, but the U.S. maintains over 1000 military bases in at least 74 countries at present, so the dispossessed multitude would have to be brain-dead not to recognize that the neoliberal elites are planning to extend their operating theater to a global battlespace: employing propaganda, COMINT [communication intelligence], SIGINT [signal intelligence], ELINT [electronic intelligence], drones, nano-satellites, SWAT teams and a vast array of high-tech weapons to enforce its neoliberal propaganda and pacific

Rania Khalek

Rania Khalek's picture

Rania Khalek is an independent journalist reporting on the underclass and marginalized.